Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + +
no edit summary
Thanks for your support, Rod, but we can't make unfounded accusations. Do you have any information to back up your conjecture that she "only made the statement to boost sales"? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup>
Thanks for your support, Rod, but we can't make unfounded accusations. Do you have any information to back up your conjecture that she "only made the statement to boost sales"? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup>
==Annoyed==
I have put serious time into crafting this page and I return to find it gutted. This is ridicules because Ed Poor doesn't like her, the page has turned to bunk. She is relevent for two reasons, one former atheist. Second reason, her works after conversion are remarkable enough to be cited by the Catholic Church. ....I know this is a collaborative project that anyone can change. But to absolutely ruin this page because somebody doesn't like her is wrong and not in the best interest of Conservapedia.--jpatt 19:22, 22 November 2008 (EST)