186
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + + +
→Working Together
That sentence should be in the article! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:28, 22 November 2008 (EST)
That sentence should be in the article! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:28, 22 November 2008 (EST)
:You could have provoked such remarks without (1) suddenly deleting and restoring the article (after my implied protest), (2) wiping the restored article and replacing it with a stub, (3) removing my discussion posts which protested your action and highlighted how you acted without discussion and then accused me of not discussing, and (4) blocking me for trying to restore hours of hard and solid work by me and Jpatt. Though thanks to Henry, Learn Together and you for kindly reconsidering most of those points.
:Seriously, this is what the talk pages are there for. You can start a discussion. There was no need to grab our attention by completely wiping hard work.
:As for the sentence itself, it sounds somewhat prosaic, and it would need sources for the "villified" part at least. I agree with the general sentiment (and think that her recent pro-Christian novels wouldn't sell as well if she hadn't established a large readership base through the Vampire Chronicles), but the sentence needs work. But that's what we're here for, right? --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 21:36, 22 November 2008 (EST)