Changes

In '''''Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. Southworth''''', 529 U.S. 217 (2000), the unanimous [[U.S. Supreme Court]] allowed the collection of mandatory student activities fees by the [[University of Wisconsin]] only if they are spent in a viewpoint-neutral manner, and not exclusively on [[liberal]] programs:<ref>''Id.'' at 220</ref>

In '''''Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. Southworth''''', 529 U.S. 217 (2000), the unanimous [[U.S. Supreme Court]] allowed the collection of mandatory student activities fees by the [[University of Wisconsin]] only if they are spent in a viewpoint-neutral manner, and not exclusively on [[liberal]] programs:<ref>''Id.'' at 220</ref>

:"The First Amendment permits a public university to charge its students an activity fee used to fund a program to facilitate extracurricular student speech if the program is viewpoint neutral. We do not sustain, however, the student referendum mechanism of the University's program, which appears to permit the exaction of fees in violation of the viewpoint neutrality principle. As to that aspect of the program, we remand for further proceedings."

:"The First Amendment permits a public university to charge its students an activity fee used to fund a program to facilitate extracurricular student speech if the program is viewpoint neutral. We do not sustain, however, the student referendum mechanism of the University's program, which appears to permit the exaction of fees in violation of the [[viewpoint neutrality]] principle. As to that aspect of the program, we remand for further proceedings."

The Court continued:<ref>''Southworth'', 529 U.S. at 229.</ref>

The Court continued:<ref>''Southworth'', 529 U.S. at 229.</ref>