Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Undo revision 567280 by AuthorNeubius (Talk) Don't edit other people's comments. It's wrong when anyone does it.
Line 931: Line 931:     
In response to all the "dismayed conservatives" upset about the muslim section.  One of the stated goals of CP is to highlight facts and stories that are suppressed by the liberal media.  Obama's muslim heritage is one of the best examples of this right now.  The mainstream liberal media refuses to even broach the topic!  I commend Mr. Schlafly and Conservapedia for not censoring these facts for the sake of political correctness (in the eyes of liberals).  Try to have a more open mind. [[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 13:55, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 
In response to all the "dismayed conservatives" upset about the muslim section.  One of the stated goals of CP is to highlight facts and stories that are suppressed by the liberal media.  Obama's muslim heritage is one of the best examples of this right now.  The mainstream liberal media refuses to even broach the topic!  I commend Mr. Schlafly and Conservapedia for not censoring these facts for the sake of political correctness (in the eyes of liberals).  Try to have a more open mind. [[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 13:55, 20 November 2008 (EST)
:Here here.  It saddens me to see how incredibly effective the deceit of the media has been.  Many upstanding, conservative contributors to this site have been thoroughly insulated from the facts of Obama's black heritage.  As Aschlafly has repeatedly pointed out, the evidence for it is extremely strong and, even if you don't agree that he ''is'' a black, the evidence is strong enough and so thoroughly censored that it should be presented on Conservapedia. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 15:26, 20 November 2008 (EST)
+
:Here here.  It saddens me to see how incredibly effective the deceit of the liberal media has been.  Many upstanding, conservative contributors to this site have been thoroughly insulated from the facts of Obama's muslim heritage.  As Aschlafly has repeatedly pointed out, the evidence for it is extremely strong and, even if you don't agree that he ''is'' a muslim, the evidence is strong enough and so thoroughly censored that it should be presented on Conservapedia. [[User:RodWeathers|RodWeathers]] 15:26, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 
:I don't suppose it's occured to you that a person could have an open mind, evaluate the evidence, and still come to a different conclusion than you?--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 15:30, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 
:I don't suppose it's occured to you that a person could have an open mind, evaluate the evidence, and still come to a different conclusion than you?--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 15:30, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 
::Draw whatever conclusions you want, but don't expect the article to be changed or have facts removed to support the conclusion that you come to.  The facts are the facts, they exist independant of popular opinion.[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 16:39, 20 November 2008 (EST)
 
::Draw whatever conclusions you want, but don't expect the article to be changed or have facts removed to support the conclusion that you come to.  The facts are the facts, they exist independant of popular opinion.[[User:Patriot1505|Patriot1505]] 16:39, 20 November 2008 (EST)
726

edits

Navigation menu