343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 62:
Line 62: +
Debate:What exactly is Conservapedia? (view source)
Revision as of 08:18, March 22, 2007
, 08:18, March 22, 2007→Is Conservapedia a Christian Website: I think so, yes. reliable.
:::We have been told that the Bible is considered a reliable source on Conservapedia... that is for more than issues directly related to it. Are the holy books of other religions reliable sources as well? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 16:02, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:::We have been told that the Bible is considered a reliable source on Conservapedia... that is for more than issues directly related to it. Are the holy books of other religions reliable sources as well? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 16:02, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:::: Well, what does "reliable" mean? If a book has been in existence for a number of years, is read, studied and used as a base for thinking and action by thousands or millions of people, surely it has to be considered a valid source of information, huh ? When in Rome, do as the Romans do. When it comes to "reliable", the public's opinion of "reliable" is what is reliable (I would think) [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 04:18, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
== Is Conservapedia neutral or onesided==
== Is Conservapedia neutral or onesided==