90
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: +
no edit summary
:Ed, I fail to see how my comment was a personal attack. I established in my first comment that what I want is a discussion. I also presented my view and my reasons for it, which is quite condusive to discussion. HenryS presented only his view, which I pointed out, and somehow pointing this out is a personal attack. You did the same thing Henry did, and in addition you accused me of being morally low. Thanks. Let's try to have a '''discussion''', please.--[[User:JZim|JZim]] 19:46, 24 November 2008 (EST)
:Ed, I fail to see how my comment was a personal attack. I established in my first comment that what I want is a discussion. I also presented my view and my reasons for it, which is quite condusive to discussion. HenryS presented only his view, which I pointed out, and somehow pointing this out is a personal attack. You did the same thing Henry did, and in addition you accused me of being morally low. Thanks. Let's try to have a '''discussion''', please.--[[User:JZim|JZim]] 19:46, 24 November 2008 (EST)
::The film is not notable enough for its own article in an encyclopedia. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:51, 24 November 2008 (EST)
::The film is not notable enough for its own article in an encyclopedia. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:51, 24 November 2008 (EST)
:::Is it somehow more notable than Expelled? As far as I know, more people watched Religulous than Expelled, and also, Religulous was at the box office, is relevant to religious discussion here. It certainly was a notable film in its own right. Perhaps it was not as notable as, say, Batman, but in its class it was one of the most notable films of the last few years.--[[User:JZim|JZim]] 20:13, 24 November 2008 (EST)