77
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 37:
Line 37: + +
no edit summary
::::I see no reason even for anti-homosexuals to be offended or threatened by the notion that animals may exhibit homosexual behavior. Since when is behavior among animals reason to recommend it for humans? Bonobos may fling fecal matter as well, but that does not ''necessarily'' lend credibility to the [[feces flinging agenda]]. [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] 14:47, 25 November 2008 (EST)
::::I see no reason even for anti-homosexuals to be offended or threatened by the notion that animals may exhibit homosexual behavior. Since when is behavior among animals reason to recommend it for humans? Bonobos may fling fecal matter as well, but that does not ''necessarily'' lend credibility to the [[feces flinging agenda]]. [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] 14:47, 25 November 2008 (EST)
:::::Sorry, but I seriously doubt your facetious comments amuse anyone here. If you can't contribute intelligently perhaps you'd be better off a Wikipedia, where such childishness is encouraged. [[User:AlbertW|AlbertW]] 14:52, 25 November 2008 (EST)
==Need==
==Need==
Not to belabor the point, but I don't really see this article being ''encyclopedic'' enough to warrant all of this work going into it. An article specifically about ''two'' "gay" penguins? I once again suggest deleting this article. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 14:03, 25 November 2008 (EST)
Not to belabor the point, but I don't really see this article being ''encyclopedic'' enough to warrant all of this work going into it. An article specifically about ''two'' "gay" penguins? I once again suggest deleting this article. -[[User:DrSandstone|DrSandstone]] 14:03, 25 November 2008 (EST)