Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − + + + + + + +
contrast between abortion and homosexuality
Choice is the basis of [[law]]. Choice is a fundamentally [[human]] activity, since law applying to animals does not apply to the choices made by animals. Instead, laws such as animal control and animal abuse laws apply to the choices of humans in regards to animals.
Choice is the basis of [[law]]. Choice is a fundamentally [[human]] activity, since law applying to animals does not apply to the choices made by animals. Instead, laws such as animal control and animal abuse laws apply to the choices of humans in regards to animals.
=="Pro-Choice"==
==Liberalism and choice==
===Abortion===
Choice has been used by proponents of [[abortion]] (pro-choice), who claim that a [[pregnancy|pregnant]] woman has the right to abort an unborn child. Opponents of abortion claim point out that someone does not have the "choice" whether someone else, such as an unborn child, should live. In the words of a popular bumper sticker, "It's a child, not a choice."
Choice has been used by proponents of [[abortion]] (pro-choice), who claim that a [[pregnancy|pregnant]] woman has the right to abort an unborn child. Opponents of abortion claim point out that someone does not have the "choice" whether someone else, such as an unborn child, should live. In the words of a popular bumper sticker, "It's a child, not a choice."
[[category:philosophy]]
[[category:philosophy]]
===Homosexuality===
In contrast, liberals argue that the decision to engage in [[homosexual activity]] is not at all a matter of choice, and that the lack of choice in this matter absolves them of all charges of sin.