1,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: +
→"Affirmative sites"=
Surely this is a joke. Not one of those sites is a reputable source from proponents of evolution describing a "religion" called Evolutionism. This article needs to be deleted. I was for deletion when it was first written, and I stand by that view. I appreciate the hard work the author put into the entry but the fact remains that this article is a slap in the face to those who accept evolution. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]<sup>[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</sup> 07:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
Surely this is a joke. Not one of those sites is a reputable source from proponents of evolution describing a "religion" called Evolutionism. This article needs to be deleted. I was for deletion when it was first written, and I stand by that view. I appreciate the hard work the author put into the entry but the fact remains that this article is a slap in the face to those who accept evolution. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]]<sup>[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</sup> 07:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
:Agreed. I wouldn't object to a well-written article on physicalism, but this is just ridiculous. If on one hand, one can accept evolution without being an evolutionist, and on the other hand, being an evolutionist doesn't automatically lead one to the theory of evolution (any more than it leads one to any other scientific theory), what's with the name? Cheap shot, nothing more. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:35, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
== I think not ==
== I think not ==