Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
160 bytes added ,  17:26, November 26, 2008
→‎Prequel/Sequel: how about "prelude"?
Line 3: Line 3:     
I think that one can't say that Lord of the Rings is a "sequel" to the hobbit.  The Lord of the Rings is much thicker in style, writing and information.  --[[User:Additioner]] 14:40, 25 April 2007
 
I think that one can't say that Lord of the Rings is a "sequel" to the hobbit.  The Lord of the Rings is much thicker in style, writing and information.  --[[User:Additioner]] 14:40, 25 April 2007
 +
 +
:I think the publisher described it as an "enchanting prelude". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:26, 26 November 2008 (EST)
    
== Book Cover ==
 
== Book Cover ==
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu