Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
good points - must go into the article
Line 389: Line 389:     
Now certainly Protestants and LDS would disagree on a great many of things. But if we wish to have a meaningful dialogue, then we must do our best to represent each other accurately. It is perfectly fine to link to a defense of LDS teachings, but preferably not one that so utterly microprints the historical beliefs of Protestants. The Trinity was the major issue at hand here, although to be honest there were many other glaring errors on the author part. But, to cut to the chase, because Protestant theology has been misrepresented in this way I humbly suggest that the link be removed. Thank you. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 07:01, 27 November 2008 (EST)
 
Now certainly Protestants and LDS would disagree on a great many of things. But if we wish to have a meaningful dialogue, then we must do our best to represent each other accurately. It is perfectly fine to link to a defense of LDS teachings, but preferably not one that so utterly microprints the historical beliefs of Protestants. The Trinity was the major issue at hand here, although to be honest there were many other glaring errors on the author part. But, to cut to the chase, because Protestant theology has been misrepresented in this way I humbly suggest that the link be removed. Thank you. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 07:01, 27 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:Ultima, thank you for your refreshing, sincere, and comprehensive analysis. You have clearly brought out the contrast between what Mormons and Trinitarians believe. Dean and I will incorporate these ideas into the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:09, 27 November 2008 (EST)
    
==Controversy as Christians?==
 
==Controversy as Christians?==
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu