999
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 120:
Line 120: + + + +
Debate:Natural Disaster versus Act of God (view source)
Revision as of 13:23, March 22, 2007
, 13:23, March 22, 2007no edit summary
:::::::Can we all agree that this should be a debate topic again and not an article?-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 12:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:::::::Can we all agree that this should be a debate topic again and not an article?-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 12:36, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
==Free Will?==
How can a "free will" exist? Even to ask the question implies that one has the necessary capability to understand their life apart from GOD. In reality, the world the LORD lives in, there is no life without HIM. I am not saying this because I want people to accept JESUS CHRIST as their personal SAVIOUR, but because, like smoking (where everybody eventually quits) everybody eventually accepts the LORD. To even think that we meager simpletons can make a decision without HIM is patently false. This applies to this idea of so-called "natural disasters." If the LORD didn't want us to experience grief, HE wouldn't have created it. Like a child who needs a spanking, sometimes the LORD must punish us. The Noachian Flood is a perfect example of this. The LORD chose to destroy most of the world so it could be re-born. Hurricane Katrina is the same thing. Those who became wikcked--through act or deed--were smited and punished for their sins. How could it be any other way? And to say the LORD made the program and sat back to watch it work is like saying I have a child I put him in the yard to see if he lives. No, my friends, there is no "free will." There is only a choice for those who want to spend eternity with the ONE TRUE GOD, and those who don't. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 09:23, 22 March 2007 (EDT)