Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
224 bytes added ,  00:46, November 28, 2008
Line 67: Line 67:     
:All other examples in that section seem to REQUIRE the AC. The subset thing doesn't. My edit doesn't justify the AC, but it points out that the nature of that absurdity isn't a direct consequence of the AC - the AC can just be used to construct it easily. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 19:28, 27 November 2008 (EST)
 
:All other examples in that section seem to REQUIRE the AC. The subset thing doesn't. My edit doesn't justify the AC, but it points out that the nature of that absurdity isn't a direct consequence of the AC - the AC can just be used to construct it easily. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 19:28, 27 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::But your distinction seems misplaced.  The meaningful point is that AC proves an absurdity.  It is irrelevant that another axiom may also produce the absurdity.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:46, 27 November 2008 (EST)
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
    
<references/>
 
<references/>
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,551

edits

Navigation menu