| Line 75: |
Line 75: |
| | ::::::And one for Andy... | | ::::::And one for Andy... |
| | ::::::*''AndyJM repeatedly deleted insights from entries, without explaining his deletions.'' | | ::::::*''AndyJM repeatedly deleted insights from entries, without explaining his deletions.'' |
| − | ::::::It has been pointed out that (for example) his edit to this article was correct - the claim had been wrong. | + | ::::::It has been pointed out that (for example) his edit to this article was correct - the claim had been wrong. So it hadn't been an insight, but an error. |
| | ::::::*''That can be highly destructive if allowed to continue.'' | | ::::::*''That can be highly destructive if allowed to continue.'' |
| | ::::::In my eyes, it's way more destructive to insert wrong information and to use block powers to intimidate and silence the opposition. | | ::::::In my eyes, it's way more destructive to insert wrong information and to use block powers to intimidate and silence the opposition. |
| Line 81: |
Line 81: |
| | ::::::At least in this case, he had been right. And BRichtigen ''tried'' to discuss the other edits, but Foxtrot wasn't in the mood and instead won the discussion by means of blocking. | | ::::::At least in this case, he had been right. And BRichtigen ''tried'' to discuss the other edits, but Foxtrot wasn't in the mood and instead won the discussion by means of blocking. |
| | ::::::*''Certainly his style was inappropriate in failing to explain or discuss his deletions.'' | | ::::::*''Certainly his style was inappropriate in failing to explain or discuss his deletions.'' |
| − | ::::::He explained at least this deletion here, but Foxtrot removed the explanation for some reason instead of, you know, ''discussing'' about its validity. | + | ::::::He explained at least this deletion here, but Foxtrot removed the explanation for some reason instead of, you know, ''discussing'' about its validity. He also summed up his reasoning in the edit summaries at least. |
| | ::::::*His block can be undone if you disagree, but more discussion would be needed about his specific edits.'' | | ::::::*His block can be undone if you disagree, but more discussion would be needed about his specific edits.'' |
| | ::::::It would be immensely helpful if you could unblock BRichtigen. He already started such a discussion (I pasted a part of it here), and his knowledge might prove to be useful. I can (and will) take a closer look myself tomorrow, but having another experienced editor handy would lighten my load. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 22:13, 27 November 2008 (EST) | | ::::::It would be immensely helpful if you could unblock BRichtigen. He already started such a discussion (I pasted a part of it here), and his knowledge might prove to be useful. I can (and will) take a closer look myself tomorrow, but having another experienced editor handy would lighten my load. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 22:13, 27 November 2008 (EST) |