4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 72:
Line 72: + + Line 86:
Line 88: + + +
Talk:Axiom of Choice (view source)
Revision as of 10:26, November 28, 2008
, 10:26, November 28, 2008→My edits: two replies to AlanS
:::I disagree with his removals and your recent edits to the Obama article as well as your past history do not instill confidence in what you are saying. Typos can be fixed, but it's wrong to remove information along with the typos. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 16:44, 27 November 2008 (EST)
:::I disagree with his removals and your recent edits to the Obama article as well as your past history do not instill confidence in what you are saying. Typos can be fixed, but it's wrong to remove information along with the typos. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 16:44, 27 November 2008 (EST)
::::::::It's too late for me to do my own analysis right now, but I will see if I can add something tomorrow. In the meantime, you could do your part to show how AndyJM's edits were bad enough to warrant a five-year ban. We showed that at least one of his removals was entirely justified because it removed ''wrong'' information. I wouldn't be surprised if his other edits were okay, too. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 22:04, 27 November 2008 (EST)
::::::::It's too late for me to do my own analysis right now, but I will see if I can add something tomorrow. In the meantime, you could do your part to show how AndyJM's edits were bad enough to warrant a five-year ban. We showed that at least one of his removals was entirely justified because it removed ''wrong'' information. I wouldn't be surprised if his other edits were okay, too. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 22:04, 27 November 2008 (EST)
:::::::::You have not shown how one of his removals was entirely justified. In fact, the removal was ''not'' justified. He removed valuable information from the article, rather than reworking it into a more acceptable form as it is now. He chose to remove entirely rather than to seek advice, and he did this repeatedly. His other edits removed valuable information as well, and if you and BRichtigen can't see that then I'm not sure either of you should be editing mathematics articles here. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 05:26, 28 November 2008 (EST)
::::::And one for Andy...
::::::And one for Andy...
::::::: OK, done per your request. Thanks and let's see what happens next.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:31, 27 November 2008 (EST)
::::::: OK, done per your request. Thanks and let's see what happens next.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:31, 27 November 2008 (EST)
::::::::It has been pointed out several times to you that his edit to the article was not correct, that he was not justified in removing the content. The content has remained in the entry and is valuable to it -- Andy agrees with this being another bizarre result from the Axiom of Choice and it benefits the article to LEAVE IT IN.
::::::::Let me add that there's no need for your sarcasm and false personification of my "mood" and how I deal with editors. When an editor is removing valuable content from multiple entries, then they are blocked. When another editor refuses to follow a more senior editor's better judgment and persists on the point despite warning, they are blocked. You, my friend, are following the same path of haranguing behavior and that is why I have warned you that it may cause you to be blocked (and probably should have). But instead you're mischaracterizing this as "threats". I don't block often, but when I do it is with sound judgment. Enough time has already been wasted on this whole matter -- in the time I spent today dealing with your whining I could have made several worthwhile contributions and probably you could have too. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 05:26, 28 November 2008 (EST)
== Latest edit ==
== Latest edit ==