Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:  
:::Feel free to expand the article if you wish. I might even join you. But you can do that without removing the creationist material. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 10:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:::Feel free to expand the article if you wish. I might even join you. But you can do that without removing the creationist material. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 10:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
   −
::::What I'm saying is, that material is fine--provided one acknowledges that the opinion of creationists, ESPECIALLY YEC's--is viewed in the scientific community as belonging to the lunatic fringe.  One can be socially and politically conservative without making oneself look like idiot by espousing such nonesense as YEC.  Science shouldn't be politicized--far too many things already are!!  Scientific method has nothing to with ideology, it has eveything to do with coming up with better hypotheses about the universe based on empirical observations. [[User:Scientz|Scientz]] 10:56 AM, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
+
::::What I'm saying is, that material is fine--provided one acknowledges that the opinion of creationists, ESPECIALLY YEC's--is viewed in the scientific community as belonging to the lunatic fringe.  One can be socially and politically conservative without making oneself look like idiot by espousing such nonesense as YEC.  Science shouldn't be politicized--far too many things already are!!  Scientific method should have nothing to with ideology; it should have eveything to do with coming up with better hypotheses about the universe based on empirical observations. [[User:Scientz|Scientz]] 10:56 AM, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
13

edits

Navigation menu