Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 63: Line 63:  
[[Image:Barry_setterfield.jpg‎|right|thumb|175px|[[Barry Setterfield]]]]
 
[[Image:Barry_setterfield.jpg‎|right|thumb|175px|[[Barry Setterfield]]]]
 
Anti-creationists often claim that [[star|starlight]] from millions of light years away demonstrates that the Biblical timescale of 6,000 years is in error, as insufficient time has passed for the light from distant stars to reach [[Earth]].
 
Anti-creationists often claim that [[star|starlight]] from millions of light years away demonstrates that the Biblical timescale of 6,000 years is in error, as insufficient time has passed for the light from distant stars to reach [[Earth]].
−
Creationists respond in part by pointing out that the popular Big Bang theory has its own star light-travel time problem (the horizon problem), citing the work of Dr. [[Charles W. Misner]], <ref>Lisle, Jason, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/167/ Light-travel time: a problem for the big bang], Creation 25(4):48–49, September 2003.</ref> even if the Orizon problem deals with the speed of the Univers, not the speed in the Universe.
+
Creationists respond in part by pointing out that the popular Big Bang theory has its own star light-travel time problem (the horizon problem), citing the work of Dr. [[Charles W. Misner]], <ref>Lisle, Jason, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/167/ Light-travel time: a problem for the big bang], Creation 25(4):48–49, September 2003.</ref> even if the horizon problem deals with the speed of the Univers, not the speed in the Universe.
     

Navigation menu