3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − There's a point of view that says that the only way that [[science]] can make progress is by showing that theories are wrong. The argument goes like this: It's impossible to prove that a theory is right no matter how many experiments agree with it, but if one single [[experiment]] disagrees with it, then the theory must be wrong. Well, that itself is a theory of knowledge, which is wrong! Because, there are theories in science, which are so well verified by experience that they become promoted to the status of fact. [http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue38/einstein.html] − Dr. [[Walter M. Robinson]], associate director of the division of [[medical ethics]] at [[Harvard Medical School]], said, "A little knowledge of the [[history of science]] tells us that advances are generally not planned and can't be predicted, but come from accidents and [[serendipitous moments]]." [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9500E3DD1739F93BA25752C0A9629C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print (New York Times)] − − − [[Category:Essays]]
Essay:Scientific progress (view source)
Revision as of 02:16, December 2, 2008
, 02:16, December 2, 2008Removing all content from page