Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)

Revision as of 15:48, December 2, 2008

507 bytes added ,  15:48, December 2, 2008
final reply to Krysg
Line 103: Line 103:     
Still waiting on a reply to the above, paticularly the username comment, which I really don't understand at all. --[[User:Krysg|Krysg]] 15:58, 30 November 2008 (EST)
 
Still waiting on a reply to the above, paticularly the username comment, which I really don't understand at all. --[[User:Krysg|Krysg]] 15:58, 30 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
: Krysg, your contributions have been meager here; your name hides behind anonymity; and your suggestion that "CE" instead of "AD" is necessary "in order to gain academic credibility" is absurd.  Unless you raise the quality and quantity of your contributions and statements, this will be my last reply to you.  Pursue your quest to spread "CE" (which denies the historical basis of the calendar) far and wide somewhere else, not here.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:48, 2 December 2008 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,551

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/575354"

Navigation menu