| − | Part of the book's thesis is that the general public and students of science hold the words of scientists in awe even when these are merely "latinized nonsense"<ref name=NYTobit/>. According to [[Time magazine]], Standen's concerns are that scientists are "overbearing," "overpraised," and "overinduluged"<ref>[[Time magazine]], "Is vs. Ought", (Monday Mar. 27 1950)</ref>. | + | Part of the book's thesis is that the general public and students of science hold the words of scientists in awe even when these are merely "latinized nonsense"<ref name=NYTobit/>. According to a March 1950 issue of [[Time magazine]], Standen's concerns are that scientists are "overbearing," "overpraised," and "overinduluged"<ref>[[Time magazine]], "Is vs. Ought", (Monday Mar. 27 1950)</ref>. |