Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Thesis: +March 1950 issue of
Line 2: Line 2:     
==Thesis==
 
==Thesis==
−
Part of the book's thesis is that the general public and students of science hold the words of scientists in awe even when these are merely "latinized nonsense"<ref name=NYTobit/>. According to [[Time magazine]], Standen's concerns are that scientists are "overbearing," "overpraised," and "overinduluged"<ref>[[Time magazine]], "Is vs. Ought", (Monday Mar. 27 1950)</ref>.
+
Part of the book's thesis is that the general public and students of science hold the words of scientists in awe even when these are merely "latinized nonsense"<ref name=NYTobit/>. According to a March 1950 issue of [[Time magazine]], Standen's concerns are that scientists are "overbearing," "overpraised," and "overinduluged"<ref>[[Time magazine]], "Is vs. Ought", (Monday Mar. 27 1950)</ref>.
    
==Contents==
 
==Contents==
1,887

edits

Navigation menu