154
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 150:
Line 150: + +
Conservapedia talk:Obama straw poll (view source)
Revision as of 01:16, December 3, 2008
, 01:16, December 3, 2008→It is time to end this foolish endeavor. Now.
::::::::Do you consider me part of that clique, Bugler? Because I am very opposed to censorship. I just don't want to see opinions posted as facts! I believe that the articles here should be concerned only with the facts, and not opinions. However, I would be willing to compromise. I propose that all opinions and speculations about a topic be placed in a section titled "Opinions" (or something similar) in the article for that topic. --'' '''[[user:JArneal|<font color="#006666" >JArneal</font>]]''' '' 20:06, 2 December 2008 (EST)
::::::::Do you consider me part of that clique, Bugler? Because I am very opposed to censorship. I just don't want to see opinions posted as facts! I believe that the articles here should be concerned only with the facts, and not opinions. However, I would be willing to compromise. I propose that all opinions and speculations about a topic be placed in a section titled "Opinions" (or something similar) in the article for that topic. --'' '''[[user:JArneal|<font color="#006666" >JArneal</font>]]''' '' 20:06, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:::::::::Prime facie evidence is posted as such, not as established fact. It is the 'clique' that is suggesting, very wrongly, that it is. We in the 'posse' just wish to see the two schools of thought presented with equal esteem, something which seems to stick in the craw of the cliquists, and to provoke them to insulting and intemperate language. I don't see you as connected with the clique, btw. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 20:10, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:::::::::Prime facie evidence is posted as such, not as established fact. It is the 'clique' that is suggesting, very wrongly, that it is. We in the 'posse' just wish to see the two schools of thought presented with equal esteem, something which seems to stick in the craw of the cliquists, and to provoke them to insulting and intemperate language. I don't see you as connected with the clique, btw. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 20:10, 2 December 2008 (EST)
[unindent] Ok another suggestion: It seems, from my viewpoint, that the Obama article doesn't list many objections that the clique (that's how I'm going to refer to you guys from now on) have proposed. Why not keep the list of proof that the posse has assembled and then underneath (or above or wherever can be agreed is the best place for it) allow the clique to have a list of objections or counterclaims to the above evidence. So that way, the list is not censored and both sections receive the same layout and attention to detail etc. so they are truly equal. --[[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 20:16, 2 December 2008 (EST)