| | ::: You know, hidden away in that comment there is actually a decent question (which I have an answer for), but until and unless you retract the unjustified slurs associated with it, you don't deserve an answer. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:07, 2 December 2008 (EST) | | ::: You know, hidden away in that comment there is actually a decent question (which I have an answer for), but until and unless you retract the unjustified slurs associated with it, you don't deserve an answer. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:07, 2 December 2008 (EST) |
| | ::::'Injured feelings' make such a useful shield when one is on the ropes! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:53, 2 December 2008 (EST) | | ::::'Injured feelings' make such a useful shield when one is on the ropes! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:53, 2 December 2008 (EST) |
| | Now I am not suggesting we stop making important policy suggestions; just that we can do so in a more polite way. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:14, 2 December 2008 (EST) | | Now I am not suggesting we stop making important policy suggestions; just that we can do so in a more polite way. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:14, 2 December 2008 (EST) |
| | :This is getting nowhere, why not a deal? Why not something along the lines of: Andy, TK, Bugler and their posse can keep the article as they like it now until Obama is sworn into office. If Obama is sworn in on the Koran then keep the article, if he is sworn in on the Bible, then relegate the accusations/evidence of him being islamic to a lower part of the article and include some counter evidence provided by PJR, conservative, Tim and their posse. Or something along those lines, or some kind of deal. Because a compromise seems to me to be the only way forward that can potentially please both sides of this debate. --[[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 19:02, 2 December 2008 (EST) | | :This is getting nowhere, why not a deal? Why not something along the lines of: Andy, TK, Bugler and their posse can keep the article as they like it now until Obama is sworn into office. If Obama is sworn in on the Koran then keep the article, if he is sworn in on the Bible, then relegate the accusations/evidence of him being islamic to a lower part of the article and include some counter evidence provided by PJR, conservative, Tim and their posse. Or something along those lines, or some kind of deal. Because a compromise seems to me to be the only way forward that can potentially please both sides of this debate. --[[User:Bolly|Bolly]] 19:02, 2 December 2008 (EST) |