Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:     
*Well, this is the ConservaPedia....its outlook is announced in its name, no?  One cannot look at either party without seeing the secular agenda of the Democrat platform, which is certainly, according to hundreds of polls, out-of-step with the majority of Democrats out there. --[[User:TK|TK]] 21:32, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 
*Well, this is the ConservaPedia....its outlook is announced in its name, no?  One cannot look at either party without seeing the secular agenda of the Democrat platform, which is certainly, according to hundreds of polls, out-of-step with the majority of Democrats out there. --[[User:TK|TK]] 21:32, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== New Deal was a success? ==
 +
That's certainly news to me.  Most historical analysis has shown that FDR's policies likely prolonged the Great Depression much longer than it otherwise would have been.  Too bad this article is locked so people can't correct the liberal bias in it.--[[User:Conservateur|Conservateur]] 14:16, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
386

edits

Navigation menu