Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
653 bytes removed ,  18:17, March 22, 2007
rm blatant opinion, linking out
Line 1: Line 1: −
   
== '''Cavemen''' ==
 
== '''Cavemen''' ==
   −
According to popular evolutionist convention, the caveman is an ancestor of modern-day humans. Having evolved over the past 40million years, the purported intermediaries in the ''Homo sapiens'' line supposedly demonstrate clear morphological links between modern day man and the ape-like creatures which form our heritage.[http://web4health.info/en/aux/homo-sapiens-future.html] The most likely explanation is that there never was a "caveman" and that man's first abode was, of course, the Garden of Eden.
+
A '''Caveman''' is a higly stylized version of what [[evolutionism|evolutionists]] believe the ancestors to modern humans may have looke like. Having evolved over the past 40 million years, the purported intermediaries in the ''Homo sapiens'' line supposedly demonstrate clear morphological links between modern day man and the ape-like creatures which form our heritage.[http://web4health.info/en/aux/homo-sapiens-future.html]
−
 
  −
The above account of evolution from a caveman is seen to be flawed beyond recognition after the application of a little intelligent analysis.
     −
Firstly, what about the large amount of hair loss we see between the caveman and the modern-day human? Evolutionists, while attempting to point out climate and sexual attentuation as motivations for hair loss, are advocating claims which have no support in the fossil record. In fact, all known historical finds of human skeletons are lacking the hair of the so-called caveman! The skeletons have, in fact, the same amount or less hair than humans ''as we know them today''!
+
==See Also==
 +
[[Neanderthal]]
 +
[[Cro-Magnon]]
4,542

edits

Navigation menu