1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 229:
Line 229: + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Obama straw poll (view source)
Revision as of 16:35, December 3, 2008
, 16:35, December 3, 2008→Change: new section
In a way, TK's right though... pages like this never really accomplish anyhting. CP has a sort of "go argue on the talk page because you're easier to ignore there and we can 90/10 block you if you are persistent" policy. On some issues it really comes down to what Andy thinks and anyone can argue 'til they're blue in the face w/ out getting anything changed. I've washed my hands of the Barack Obama article because I realize it probably won't ever change. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 11:10, 3 December 2008 (EST)
In a way, TK's right though... pages like this never really accomplish anyhting. CP has a sort of "go argue on the talk page because you're easier to ignore there and we can 90/10 block you if you are persistent" policy. On some issues it really comes down to what Andy thinks and anyone can argue 'til they're blue in the face w/ out getting anything changed. I've washed my hands of the Barack Obama article because I realize it probably won't ever change. --[[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] <sub>[[User Talk:BenjaminS|Talk]]</sub> 11:10, 3 December 2008 (EST)
== Change ==
Mark my words, the only way Andy will change his mind is if Tim, Phil, and Cons all quit, and then he'll only change his mind when, after a few months, he realized that they were the only honest editors he had.-[[User:JudahB|JudahB]] 11:35, 3 December 2008 (EST)