Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
be very careful here, Dinsdale
The Trail of Tears should be considered genocide based on the references in Conservapedia's own [[Genocide|article]] on the subject. The conditions of the Trail of Tears clearly meets the conditions of items 2 and three in Article 2 of the Geneva Convention, as cited in the article. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 12:43, 3 December 2008 (EST)
The Trail of Tears should be considered genocide based on the references in Conservapedia's own [[Genocide|article]] on the subject. The conditions of the Trail of Tears clearly meets the conditions of items 2 and three in Article 2 of the Geneva Convention, as cited in the article. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 12:43, 3 December 2008 (EST)
:I support this only on the condition that you help us identify the mega-cases of genocide by regimes that have nothing to do with America, such as the [[Soviet]]s and [[Red China]]. Do not call excessive attention to (relatively) small violations of [[human rights]]. This would violate our [[undue weight]] provision, if we had one. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:00, 3 December 2008 (EST)