52
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 64:
Line 64: +
Conservapedia talk:Obama straw poll (view source)
Revision as of 18:01, December 3, 2008
, 18:01, December 3, 2008→My comment
:::::Conservapedia presents evidence. We are not arrogant dogmatists; we present evidence and facts and let the reader make up his mind. Of course, there are some minds that are too closed to be made up. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 05:49, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:::::Conservapedia presents evidence. We are not arrogant dogmatists; we present evidence and facts and let the reader make up his mind. Of course, there are some minds that are too closed to be made up. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 05:49, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:::::: Still repeating the mantra without actually addressing the issue (justifying that the claims ''are'' valid evidence). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:08, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:::::: Still repeating the mantra without actually addressing the issue (justifying that the claims ''are'' valid evidence). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:08, 2 December 2008 (EST)
:::::::Amazing. Simply amazing. I say ''"Simply saying "Conservapedia presents the facts" begs the question'', Bugler simply says ''Conservapedia presents evidence.'' Is it possible to completely ignore what was just said and spout dogma in a more blatant way?
== Nuetral light? ==
== Nuetral light? ==