Changes

Terri Shciavo was a women who drew attention to controversy surrounding right to live versus euthanasia perspectives.

Terri Shciavo was a women who drew attention to controversy surrounding right to live versus euthanasia perspectives.

Schiavo was diagnosed as in a "vegitative" state by some doctors, but this was disputed by other sources. Some argued that, even if the chance was small, she could one day be revived from her commatose state. Others argued that, whether or not she could be revived, her life should be preserved regardless. Those in favor of removing her life support, including her husband, argued that Schiavo should be allowed to "die wit dignity," rather than being kept alive in her limited state. Schiavo's husband was the main proponent of removing life support, while her parents were extremely vocal to the contrary.

Schiavo was diagnosed as in a "vegitative" state by some doctors, but this was disputed by other sources. Some argued that, even if the chance was small, she could one day be revived from her commatose state. Others argued that, whether or not she could be revived, her life should be preserved regardless. Those in favor of removing her life support, including her husband, argued that Schiavo should be allowed to "die with dignity," rather than being kept alive in her limited state. Schiavo's husband was the main proponent of removing life support, while her parents were extremely vocal to the contrary.

Ultimately, a court order upheld the husband's wishes and Schiavo's feeding tube and other life support were removed. This topic and outcome remain highly controversial.

Ultimately, a court order upheld the husband's wishes and Schiavo's feeding tube and other life support were removed. This topic and outcome remain highly controversial.