Changes

:::::Conservapedia presents evidence. We are not arrogant dogmatists; we present evidence and facts and let the reader make up his mind. Of course, there are some minds that are too closed to be made up. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 05:49, 2 December 2008 (EST)

:::::Conservapedia presents evidence. We are not arrogant dogmatists; we present evidence and facts and let the reader make up his mind. Of course, there are some minds that are too closed to be made up. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 05:49, 2 December 2008 (EST)

:::::: Still repeating the mantra without actually addressing the issue (justifying that the claims ''are'' valid evidence).  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:08, 2 December 2008 (EST)

:::::: Still repeating the mantra without actually addressing the issue (justifying that the claims ''are'' valid evidence).  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:08, 2 December 2008 (EST)

:::::::Amazing. Simply amazing. I say ''"Simply saying "Conservapedia presents the facts" begs the question'', Bugler simply says ''Conservapedia presents evidence.'' Is it possible to completely ignore what was just said and spout dogma in a more blatant way?

:::::::Amazing. Simply amazing. I say ''"Simply saying "Conservapedia presents the facts" begs the question'', Bugler simply says ''Conservapedia presents evidence.'' Is it possible to completely ignore what was just said and spout dogma in a more blatant way? {{unsigned|JHanson}}

== Nuetral light? ==

== Nuetral light? ==