2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,444:
Line 1,444: + + + + + +
Talk:Barack Hussein Obama (view source)
Revision as of 02:32, December 5, 2008
, 02:32, December 5, 2008→Muslim? Really?: new section
It wasn't lost on me. I am surprised they haven't removed the title from Bush's article yet, lol. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 20:20, 4 December 2008 (EST)
It wasn't lost on me. I am surprised they haven't removed the title from Bush's article yet, lol. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 20:20, 4 December 2008 (EST)
== Muslim? Really? ==
The evidence presented here that Barack Obama is a Muslim are weak, at best. I'm really having a hard time buying the argument that he's a Muslim, and, reading previous comments, that seems to be the general consensus. It would, I think, be much more of a credible argument if you put more emphasis on his views, his dirty political tactics, and his poor record as a Senator; explaining the depth to which he advocates killing babies is much more convincing than trying to denounce him as a Muslim, which you have little to no evidence to support. It makes the otherwise sound article seem badly researched and dependent on rumors and gossip; one of the very reasons I stopped using wikipedia was the quantity of empty claims there, and citing misfitting references here is not much better. We should be working together to keep conservapedia the trustworthy encyclopedia it once was, and not dilute our credibility by presenting guesswork and original research as factual information.
--[[User:Cjalman|Cjalman]] 21:32, 4 December 2008 (EST)