Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
confusion of terminology
I think there should be a section on logic and how it is used (or not) in a religious context, but I don't know how to start a passage on it--[[User:Falconcomeon|Falconcomeon]] 18:00, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
I think there should be a section on logic and how it is used (or not) in a religious context, but I don't know how to start a passage on it--[[User:Falconcomeon|Falconcomeon]] 18:00, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
==[[Modern logic]]==
I know of only two kinds of logic:
* the propositional calculus (If A then B; but not B; hence not A)
* the syllogism (All men are mortal; Socrates is a men; hence Socrates is mortal)
We need to tighten up our terminology:
*[[formal logic]]
*[[classical logic]]
*[[symbolic logic]]
*[[propositional calculus]]
*[[syllogism]]
What does everything redirect to? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:24, 8 December 2008 (EST)