Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,411
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 382:
Line 382: + + + +
Lochness
Dpbsmith, I briefly looked into the whole Loch Ness Monster issue. I think the best way to handle it is to provide a sentence saying some people think Nessy is credible and then provide a sentence saying some people don't. Each sentence should have links/footnotes so people can decide for themselves. I am not too interested in the whole Nessy debate but I wanted to be fair to you. I created an internal link in the Dino article. By that I mean, I created a [[Loch Ness Monster]] link. You can have at that article which links to the Dino article. Out of that article I think will come the best "pro" and "con" links. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:38, 21 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
Dpbsmith, I briefly looked into the whole Loch Ness Monster issue. I think the best way to handle it is to provide a sentence saying some people think Nessy is credible and then provide a sentence saying some people don't. Each sentence should have links/footnotes so people can decide for themselves. I am not too interested in the whole Nessy debate but I wanted to be fair to you. I created an internal link in the Dino article. By that I mean, I created a [[Loch Ness Monster]] link. You can have at that article which links to the Dino article. Out of that article I think will come the best "pro" and "con" links. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:38, 21 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
== Lochness ==
I stiil think the best solution is to find the best link(s) for pro and footnote it and find best footnote for con. I think that will happen as the article in question progresses. Perhaps, you can go to the dreaded and stenchy place [[Wikipedia]] and find the best links! LOL They seem to have a long article giving the pros and cons. However, I think we can probably find better links than Wikipedia if we try as I have often found that to be the case when I was a Wikipedian. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:44, 22 March 2007 (EDT)conservative