157
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 9:
Line 9: +
no edit summary
I have cleaned up biased and vitriolic language as best as I can, but this entry deserves deletion.
I have cleaned up biased and vitriolic language as best as I can, but this entry deserves deletion.
Seconded. If this is a homosexual agenda, then what homosexual wrote it? This is nothing but political game-playing: Identify a group as ''The Enemy'' and then brand them haters and abusers of family, children, and country. It makes dehumanising them so much easier. - Suricou
: I didn't see anything "hateful" in it. The Scalia reference was not intended to be about what is binding law, obviously. There was nothing binding about his phrase. I'll note that it was in dissent.
: I didn't see anything "hateful" in it. The Scalia reference was not intended to be about what is binding law, obviously. There was nothing binding about his phrase. I'll note that it was in dissent.