1,660
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: + +
→Un, excuse me..
:::The secularist definition of a rainbow (what you call the ''actual'' definition) is irrelevant to its description within God's Word. The Bible is the only source we need. I do agree with you that the poetic garbage is probably irrelevant. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 17:24, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
:::The secularist definition of a rainbow (what you call the ''actual'' definition) is irrelevant to its description within God's Word. The Bible is the only source we need. I do agree with you that the poetic garbage is probably irrelevant. [[User:DunsScotus|DunsScotus]] 17:24, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
:Your statement only argues for a separate article on biblical sig, and "actual" definition.[[User:Palmd001|Palmd001]] 17:56, 22 March 2007 (EDT)