Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reversion explained
Line 34: Line 34:  
:::: Finally, there was no explanation for the reversion of a wording change that was made at the same time.
 
:::: Finally, there was no explanation for the reversion of a wording change that was made at the same time.
 
:::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:12, 9 December 2008 (EST)
 
:::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:12, 9 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::::: Philip, your edits again distort the entry without justification.  For example, you say that the passage is "misused" to deny the existence of Hell (which you notably spell with a small "h").  There is evidence that the passage is fake, but no justification for saying it is "misused".  The passage, if taken at face value, does support an argument denying the existence of Hell.
 +
 +
::::: Another change is you insist on putting a website in the text rather than in a footnote, perhaps to try to downplay the (undeniable) point being made.  Websites belong in the footnotes.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:37, 9 December 2008 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Navigation menu