Changes

:Sure.  I know a bit about her views from studying the Goldwater campaign, so perhaps I can be of some use. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 12:57, 10 December 2008 (EST)

:Sure.  I know a bit about her views from studying the Goldwater campaign, so perhaps I can be of some use. [[User:RodWeathers|- Rod Weathers]] 12:57, 10 December 2008 (EST)

::I respect her a great deal, but disagree with several of her views and would be willing to contribute to an analysis of them (not as a "representative liberal", but as someone who disagrees on specific issues themselves).  The first example that comes to mind is Mrs. Schlafly's view that restraining orders are, in general, unfair to men and a tool of the feminist agenda <ref>http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2008/aug08/08-08-08.html</ref>.  Another is her contention that spousal rape is not comparable to rape by a stranger, because when a woman marries she's consented to sex, and as long as no other beatings or violence take place a husband has the right to force a sex act on his wife even when she's unwilling. <ref>http://www.studlife.com/2.3474/1.94406</ref> --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 13:17, 10 December 2008 (EST)

::I respect her a great deal, but disagree with several of her views and would be willing to contribute to an analysis of them (not as a "representative liberal", but as someone who disagrees on specific issues themselves).  The first example that comes to mind is Mrs. Schlafly's view that restraining orders are, in general, unfair to men and a tool of the feminist agenda <ref>http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2008/aug08/08-08-08.html</ref>.  Another is her contention that spousal rape is not comparable to rape by a stranger, because when a woman marries she's consented to sex, and as long as no other beatings or violence take place a husband has the right to force a sex act on his wife even when she's unwilling. <ref>http://www.studlife.com/2.3474/1.94406</ref> --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 13:17, 10 December 2008 (EST)