8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + +
Debate:Can the science of evolution be separated from the philosophy of it? (view source)
Revision as of 18:55, December 11, 2008
, 18:55, December 11, 2008no edit summary
:Therefore, even if you ''have'' a lot of shared DNA, you have not falsified [[creation]] ''or'' [[intelligent design]] if those two theories predict the ''same'' phenomenon. In order to falsify any given theory, you have to find something that it predicts that does ''not'' come to pass.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 14:55, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
:Therefore, even if you ''have'' a lot of shared DNA, you have not falsified [[creation]] ''or'' [[intelligent design]] if those two theories predict the ''same'' phenomenon. In order to falsify any given theory, you have to find something that it predicts that does ''not'' come to pass.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 14:55, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
:I agree. It would be like arguing the philosophical implications of the fact that lithium reacts exothermically with water at standard temperature and pressure to form aqueous lithium hydroxide and hydrogen gas. (This is an unholy mating of two things, neither of which is a man or woman! Do we really want to teach our children about these things?!) [[User:Nrupert|Nrupert]] 13:55, 11 December 2008 (EST)
==NO==
==NO==