Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
good
Line 13: Line 13:     
I object to these two sentences, first because not all the bullet points after it are related to the concepts of mind control or brainwashing. Second, the concept of [[mind control]] is not a scientific one. The chief proponent of the concept lost the right to testify as an [[expert witness]] when the lack of scientific basis for the theory was exposed. As for brainwashing, this is generally held to apply only to prisoners of war - or to other captives. I have not seen any information on its effects persisting after a prisoner is released or escapes. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:51, 13 December 2008 (EST)
 
I object to these two sentences, first because not all the bullet points after it are related to the concepts of mind control or brainwashing. Second, the concept of [[mind control]] is not a scientific one. The chief proponent of the concept lost the right to testify as an [[expert witness]] when the lack of scientific basis for the theory was exposed. As for brainwashing, this is generally held to apply only to prisoners of war - or to other captives. I have not seen any information on its effects persisting after a prisoner is released or escapes. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 07:51, 13 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
: Your edits to this entry are good, Ed, and I learned from your insights.  There was misplaced anti-religious bashing in it that I took out last night.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 09:07, 13 December 2008 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,219

edits

Navigation menu