248
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 635:
Line 635: + + + +
→Great job: new section
: I originally nominated it for deletion because it said that Johanan was a name, but gave no examples of anyone who was called it. If there's a famous Johanan (an Old Testament figure perhaps?), I'd suggest recreating it and making it about that person, rather than the name itself.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 09:04, 13 December 2008 (EST)
: I originally nominated it for deletion because it said that Johanan was a name, but gave no examples of anyone who was called it. If there's a famous Johanan (an Old Testament figure perhaps?), I'd suggest recreating it and making it about that person, rather than the name itself.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 09:04, 13 December 2008 (EST)
::Thank you for responding CPalmer. CPalmer is correct. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:42, 13 December 2008 (EST)
::Thank you for responding CPalmer. CPalmer is correct. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 10:42, 13 December 2008 (EST)
== Great job ==
Getting all those disturbingly named accounts. Thanks!-[[User:AlexanderM|AlexanderM]] 22:07, 13 December 2008 (EST)