Changes

:: It's an estimate, and a work in progress.  Do you doubt its truth?  Perhaps you're simply saying that a liberal newspaper would not admit this, and you'd be right about that.  But the truth is not constrained by what liberals will admit.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 18:29, 14 December 2008 (EST)

:: It's an estimate, and a work in progress.  Do you doubt its truth?  Perhaps you're simply saying that a liberal newspaper would not admit this, and you'd be right about that.  But the truth is not constrained by what liberals will admit.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 18:29, 14 December 2008 (EST)

::: I was just stating my curiosity -- one that I believe most readers share -- as to how those numbers came about. As to its validity, I have no way of knowing but based on my own encounters, those numbers look about right for the most part, except for one group that I believe is missing on that list. I know quite a few non-conservatives who, with an open mind, simply weighed conservative values against non-conservative values and decided that they identified more with non-conservative values.  Their values usually gravitate towards "freedom of choice", as defined by themselves. (Obviously we disagree with it)

::: I was just stating my curiosity -- one that I believe most readers share -- as to how those numbers came about. As to its validity, I have no way of knowing but based on my own encounters, those numbers look about right for the most part, except for one group that I believe is missing on that list. I know quite a few non-conservatives who, with an open mind, simply weighed conservative values against non-conservative values and decided that they identified more with non-conservative values.  Their values usually gravitate towards "freedom of choice", as defined by themselves. (Obviously we disagree with it)