Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
article split approved
The first bit contains examples (ill-formed ones, at that!) of ''categorical'' logic, or the Aristotelian Syllogistic, not what these days is called ''symbolic'' logic, or the Propositional Calculus. Do we want to split the article, or should I just replace the bad examples with relevant ones?
The first bit contains examples (ill-formed ones, at that!) of ''categorical'' logic, or the Aristotelian Syllogistic, not what these days is called ''symbolic'' logic, or the Propositional Calculus. Do we want to split the article, or should I just replace the bad examples with relevant ones?
:Split it, please! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:54, 15 December 2008 (EST)