3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
no edit summary
::We enjoy discussion and the honest engagement of ideas, RN: it's only a problem when sterile, circular arguments are persisted with as a technique of disruption, and 90/10 is partly to deal with that particular style of vandalism. And factual, family friendly edits are always welcomed, so feel free to pitch in! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:23, 16 December 2008 (EST)
::We enjoy discussion and the honest engagement of ideas, RN: it's only a problem when sterile, circular arguments are persisted with as a technique of disruption, and 90/10 is partly to deal with that particular style of vandalism. And factual, family friendly edits are always welcomed, so feel free to pitch in! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:23, 16 December 2008 (EST)
Will do. Article talk pages are for talk of improving the article, not debate. Even Wikipedia acknowledges that. However, I assume banter on my own talk page is fine.--[[User:RNeilson|RNeilson]] 12:24, 16 December 2008 (EST)
Will do. Article talk pages are for talk of improving the article, not debate. Even Wikipedia acknowledges that. However, I assume banter on my own talk page is fine.--[[User:RNeilson|RNeilson]] 12:24, 16 December 2008 (EST)
:::Come back! I was only kidding... [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 12:40, 16 December 2008 (EST)