Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 134: Line 134:     
::::I think we're arguing for the same side here, Andy.  I'm not disputing any statistics; that's my point.  The statistics are there ''plain as day'' that an armed citizenry opposes crime.  I would say it's just blind ignorance (or faulty logic) to believe otherwise as opposed to an abstraction.  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 14:27, 16 December 2008 (EST)
 
::::I think we're arguing for the same side here, Andy.  I'm not disputing any statistics; that's my point.  The statistics are there ''plain as day'' that an armed citizenry opposes crime.  I would say it's just blind ignorance (or faulty logic) to believe otherwise as opposed to an abstraction.  [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|<sub>Discussion</sub>]] 14:27, 16 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::::: I don't think someone having, to use popular terminology, an IQ of less than 100 can easily understand the truth of "more guns, less crime."  Abstractions become more difficult to understand the lower the intelligence.  Frankly, this abstraction strikes many highly intelligent people as wrong at first glance, before thinking more abstractly.--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 21:11, 16 December 2008 (EST)
    
==Tweaking the Statistics==
 
==Tweaking the Statistics==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,323

edits

Navigation menu