2,358
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + +
no edit summary
: Certainly not. But the rollback was not based on lack of citation, but on alleged falsity of the claim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:11, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
: Certainly not. But the rollback was not based on lack of citation, but on alleged falsity of the claim.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:11, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
::I didn't realize that Edison was not a lifelong agnostic and drop my objection. Maybe a cite would be even better. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 23:12, 22 March 2007 (EDT)