Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Mystery:Why Do Non-Conservatives Exist? (view source)

Revision as of 02:56, December 18, 2008

449 bytes added ,  02:56, December 18, 2008
→‎Tweaking the Statistics: reply
Line 158: Line 158:  
:::(The silence that will likely follow a response to the second question will not necessarily indicate acceptance of the argument it presents; more likely, it will mean that I believe a response won't add anything.)
 
:::(The silence that will likely follow a response to the second question will not necessarily indicate acceptance of the argument it presents; more likely, it will mean that I believe a response won't add anything.)
 
::-[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 18:02, 17 December 2008 (EST)
 
::-[[User:CSGuy|CSGuy]] 18:02, 17 December 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::: The more logical a liberal is the less likely he will remain a liberal.  Liberals do better in gaining adherents by avoiding logic.  If you have a logical argument for a liberal position, then I'd love to hear it.
 +
 +
::: References are being added to the entry.  Feel free to add some yourselves, unless you think that liberals never become conservatives (which is demonstrably false).--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 21:56, 17 December 2008 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,350

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/589493"

Navigation menu