316
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 69:
Line 69: + + + +
Talk:British Broadcasting Corporation (view source)
Revision as of 22:27, December 19, 2008
, 22:27, December 19, 2008Spelling?
I'm okay with the British spelling, given the nature of the article. However, the passive voice of the statement 'they will need to be redone" leaves open the question of who will redo them. I did them once, including a few egregious spelling mistakes. I'm not redoing them again. Whoever broke it can fix it. [[User:BillyR|BillyR]] 11:23, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
I'm okay with the British spelling, given the nature of the article. However, the passive voice of the statement 'they will need to be redone" leaves open the question of who will redo them. I did them once, including a few egregious spelling mistakes. I'm not redoing them again. Whoever broke it can fix it. [[User:BillyR|BillyR]] 11:23, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
== Spelling ==
Obviously this is an article about a British subject. Does anyone object to the all the US spelling in this article being changed to British?--[[User:Ieuan|Ieuan]] 17:27, 19 December 2008 (EST)