Changes

** First edit says ''protection of all of God's creation'' '''even if advocated by atheists'''. Bold added by [[User:RobS]]. He just ignores that many liberals a Christians, and many Christians are liberal. Unnecessarily offensive.

** First edit says ''protection of all of God's creation'' '''even if advocated by atheists'''. Bold added by [[User:RobS]]. He just ignores that many liberals a Christians, and many Christians are liberal. Unnecessarily offensive.

** Same edit he adds '''opposition to American foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy'''. Of course liberals would complain about the assertion that the current administration advocates human rights. But worse is the assertion that liberals don't. You might not like, for example, Carter, but he is supporting human rights and liberal. And Christian.

** Same edit he adds '''opposition to American foreign policy which advocates human rights and democracy'''. Of course liberals would complain about the assertion that the current administration advocates human rights. But worse is the assertion that liberals don't. You might not like, for example, Carter, but he is supporting human rights and liberal. And Christian.

** Calling liberal parties in Europe '''so-called''' ''moderate and center-right''. The is nothing '''so-called''' about heir position. This just shows lack of knowledge of European liberal parties. The worst part about it that there was a lengthy discussion on talk page. A few editors were struggling to find a good compromise, to characterize the European situation. [[User:RobS]] just shows an enormous amount of disrespect, by disregarding the work by other editors, and the information they provide, to make it more factual.

** Calling liberal parties in Europe '''so-called''' ''moderate and center-right''. The is nothing '''so-called''' about heir position. This just shows lack of knowledge of European liberal parties. The worst part about it that there was a lengthy discussion on the talk page. A few editors were struggling to find a good compromise, to characterize the European situation. [[User:RobS]] just shows an enormous amount of disrespect, by disregarding the work by other editors, and the information they provide, to make it more factual.

** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.

** In is next edit he claims that liberals support Saddam. That simply an opinionated fringe position. Not suitable for an article.

** And he kind of ruins the last paragraph, by inserting text at the wrong spot. But that just a normal editing mistake that can happen.

** And he kind of ruins the last paragraph, by inserting text at the wrong spot. But that just a normal editing mistake that can happen.