186
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 71:
Line 71: + + + + + +
Talk:Irreducible complexity (view source)
Revision as of 22:27, December 24, 2008
, 22:27, December 24, 2008→Darwin, the eye, and "censoring information": new section
==Typos, errors==
==Typos, errors==
Double "the" after the title of the book ''No Free Lunch''; Fifth paragraph, second word should be complexity, (extra "o"); In the second quote the phrase "speciality journals" might be better rendered "specialty" (no "i"). [[User:Samwell|Samwell]] 23:25, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
Double "the" after the title of the book ''No Free Lunch''; Fifth paragraph, second word should be complexity, (extra "o"); In the second quote the phrase "speciality journals" might be better rendered "specialty" (no "i"). [[User:Samwell|Samwell]] 23:25, 15 August 2007 (EDT)
== Darwin, the eye, and "censoring information" ==
Since this is quickly going down the same disturbing "removing valuable insights" road as [[Axiom of Choice]], I will not edit the article any more to remove your edit. However, I will simply point out, Rod, that your quote is on AiG's [http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp "Don't use"] list because, as I wrote in the edit summary, "[c]iting his statement at face value is subtly out of context." And like I also wrote in my edit summary, you are free to flesh out the argument to make your case, but I am sure you can do that without relying on out-of-context quotes, no?
I made my revert in order to not give critics overly easy targets to shoot down. If you still insist on keeping the quote in the current state, be my guest. --[[User:AlanS|AlanS]] 17:27, 24 December 2008 (EST)