Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:     
This is a difficult question because of shifting/tricky definitions of liberal & conservative.  Conservative can variously mean neo-con (ie, big gov't conservative) to libertarianism.  Populism can be an oppressive combination of the left & the right.  If "liberal" means leftist (ie, secular big-gov't welfare state), then I see this orientation as a slight overall bias of combined radio, TV & print media.  My personal observation is untrustworthy, but surveys of journalists show that Democratic Party orientation predominates.  Of course, many individual sources will be exceptions.  I believe the safest course is to seek reliable sources of different stripes to get a broader picture.[[User:Tom Stockton|Tom Stockton]] 21:38, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
 
This is a difficult question because of shifting/tricky definitions of liberal & conservative.  Conservative can variously mean neo-con (ie, big gov't conservative) to libertarianism.  Populism can be an oppressive combination of the left & the right.  If "liberal" means leftist (ie, secular big-gov't welfare state), then I see this orientation as a slight overall bias of combined radio, TV & print media.  My personal observation is untrustworthy, but surveys of journalists show that Democratic Party orientation predominates.  Of course, many individual sources will be exceptions.  I believe the safest course is to seek reliable sources of different stripes to get a broader picture.[[User:Tom Stockton|Tom Stockton]] 21:38, 13 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
unfortunately, there is no such thing as a "neutral media"
 +
 +
the big 3 - ABC, NBC, CBS, also PBS, CNN, are all liberal, with TIME and newsweek, also New York Times.
 +
 +
mass medias are pretty much took over and monopolized by liberals now
 +
 +
For FOX, it is more conservative (at least balanced), and so ends up often get bashed.[[User:Kmcheng|Kmcheng]] 17:10, 25 December 2008 (EST)
    
==No==
 
==No==
42

edits

Navigation menu