Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 203: Line 203:     
:::::::: I agree completely.  Just one of the insights in the table in this entry can be worth hundreds of hours of personal effort in value.  A stronger understanding of these concepts is priceless.  Yet it is freely available here for merely the click of the mouse.  Can you imagine the value when this table is two or three times as long?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:35, 28 December 2008 (EST)
 
:::::::: I agree completely.  Just one of the insights in the table in this entry can be worth hundreds of hours of personal effort in value.  A stronger understanding of these concepts is priceless.  Yet it is freely available here for merely the click of the mouse.  Can you imagine the value when this table is two or three times as long?--[[User:Aschlafly|aschlafly]] 16:35, 28 December 2008 (EST)
 +
::::::::::::Bugler, you are setting up a false dilemma.  If you were more aware of exegesis you would know that.  One of the principles of sound exegesis is to set the limits of the passage as can be seen by the link I offered before.  With that in mind, I certainly did not say I was against having a vision.  At the same time, often without adequate preparation the visions people have often fail.  I doubt the Normandy invasion would have been successful if the generals merely had a vision apart from adequate preparation.  The Normandy invasion was successful though because the generals had a vision which also had sufficient preparation. Now if you think you can retranslate the Bible without being knowledgeable in Greek/Hebrew and Ancient Near East culture then go right ahead, but I reasonably think your quest is rather quoxitic as can be seen by your rather poor exegesis of my previous post.  [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 17:17, 28 December 2008 (EST)
    
== "Rich" Issue ==
 
== "Rich" Issue ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,420

edits

Navigation menu